Guest struggling! Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 Hi all, I have a question that I would appreciate some advice on. My OCD is not always overt in behaviours but I spend many many hours ruminating and 'checking' in my head - thinking how I know something is OK, evidence for and against situations or events occurring or having occurred! There are times when I get new thoughts about something that hasn't been there before - sometimes about events that have occurred in the past that I may have felt a bit apprehensive about but had worked through it at the time and felt ok about it afterwards. This can trigger off whole new OCD phases that I am scared will be there long term creating whole new senarios and worries - taking previous concerns and making more and more out of them. I don't know the best way to challenge these thoughts. I never seem to understand about sitting with the thoughts, challenging them, what engaging with them is or isn't etc. I just don't think I will be able to move forward with challenging OCD until I understand this. I understand the 4 steps with the overt checking behaviours that I do (label, refocus etc) but how are thoughts managed????? Struggling! Link to comment
OCDCanuck Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 Sorry that no one has responded to your post yet... I have had some success with using the four steps with regards to my intrusive thoughts. Same steps apply: reattributing and relabeling the thought as just a thought that is due to me having OCD, and then trying to refocus my thoughts on to something more positive and constructive. When I'm in a good place, I can refocus pretty well for quite a long time...hours even. However, if I'm in not such a good place, refocusing seems impossible. Link to comment
Guest struggling! Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 Hi there OCDCanuck. Thank you for your response. I will try and apply the 4 steps to obsessive thinking too then. I think I've just doubted the procedures before because so many people say that you should accept the thought is there and not engage. I suppose I don't know the difference between challenging and engaging. Is challenging the labelling it as OCD then and focusing on other things? Is engaging when you go over the thought and try to explain it away or what it is or why or why not something can happen? I think I have seen this as challenging it by putting all the reasons as to why something is or is not there! That may be why I'm getting in a muddle and ending up with the situation ten times worse!!!! Link to comment
OCDCanuck Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 I have also struggled with the notion of just letting the thought be there vs. refocusing. Link to comment
PolarBear Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 The trick is to not challenge the thoughts at all. Doing so gives credence to the thoughts and allows them to come back stronger. Think of the thoughts as a childhood bully. Don't react and eventually the bully gives up. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now